The "Gospel of Judas"
Interview With Father Thomas Williams, Theology Dean
ROME, APRIL 5, 2006 (Zenit.org).- The National Geographic Society has
announced its intentions to publish an English translation of an
ancient text called "The Gospel of Judas" later this month.
The 31-page manuscript, written in Coptic, purportedly surfaced in
Geneva in 1983 and has only been translated now.
ZENIT asked Legionary Father Thomas D. Williams, dean of theology at
the Regina Apostolorum university in Rome, to comment on the relevance
of the discovery.
Q: What is the "Gospel of Judas"?
Father Williams: Though the manuscript still must be authenticated, it
likely represents a fourth- or fifth-century text, and is a copy of an
earlier document produced by a Gnostic sect called the Cainites.
The document paints Judas Iscariot in a positive light, and describes
him as obeying a divine ordinance in handing over Jesus to the
authorities for the salvation of the world.
It may well be a copy of the "Gospel of Judas" referred to by St.
Irenaeus of Lyons in his work "Against the Heresies," written around
Q: If authentic, what challenge would this document pose to traditional
Christian belief? Will it "shake Christianity to its foundations" as
some press releases have suggested?
Father Williams: Certainly not. The Gnostic gospels, of which there are
many besides this one, are not Christian documents per se, since they
proceed from a syncretistic sect that incorporated elements from
different religions, including Christianity.
From the moment of their appearance, the Christian community rejected
these documents because of their incompatibility with the Christian
The "Gospel of Judas" would be a document of this sort, which could
have great historical value, since it contributes to our knowledge of
the Gnostic movement, but it poses no direct challenge to Christianity.
Q: Is it true that the Church has tried to cover up this text and other
Father Williams: These are myths circulated by Dan Brown and other
You can go to any Catholic bookstore and pick up a copy of the Gnostic
gospels. Christians may not believe them to be true, but there is no
attempt to hide them.
Q: But doesn't an early document of this sort rival orthodox Christian
sources, such as the four canonical Gospels?
Father Williams: Remember that Gnosticism arose in the middle of the
second century, and the "Gospel of Judas," if authentic, probably dates
back to the mid- to late second century.
To put a historical perspective on things, that would be like you or me
writing a text now on the American Civil War and having that text later
used as a primary historical source on the war. The text could not have
been written by eyewitnesses, the way at least two of the canonical
Q: Why would the leaders of the Gnostic movement have been interested
Father Williams: One of the major differences between Gnostic belief
and that of Christianity concerns the origins of evil in the universe.
Christians believe that a good God created a good world, and that
through the abuse of free will, sin and corruption entered the world
and produced disorder and suffering.
The Gnostics blamed God for the evil in the world and claimed that he
created the world in a disordered and flawed way. Thus they champion
the rehabilitation of Old Testament figures such as Cain, who killed
his brother Abel, and Esau, the elder brother of Jacob, who sold his
birthright for a plate of pottage.
Judas fits perfectly into the Gnostic agenda of showing that God
intends evil for the world.
Q: But wasn't Judas' betrayal a necessary part of God's plan, as this
Father Williams: Being omniscient, God knows full well what choices we
will make and weaves even our bad decisions into his providential plan
for the world.
In his last published book, Pope John Paul II eloquently reflected on
how God continues to bring good out of even the worst evil that man can
That doesn't mean, however, that God intends for us to do evil, or that
he intended for Judas to betray Jesus. If it wasn't Judas, it would
have been someone else. The authorities had already decided to put
Jesus to death, and it was just a matter of time.
Q: What is the Church's position regarding Judas? Is it possible to
Father Williams: Though the Catholic Church has a canonization process
by which it declares certain persons to be in heaven, as saints, it has
no such process for declaring people to be condemned.
Historically, many have thought that Judas is probably in hell, because
of Jesus' severe indictment of Judas: "It would be better for that man
if he had never been born," as he says in Matthew 26:24. But even these
words do not offer conclusive evidence regarding his fate.
In his 1994 book, "Crossing the Threshold of Hope," Pope John Paul II
wrote that Jesus' words "do not allude for certain to eternal
Q: But if anyone deserves hell, wouldn't it be Judas?
Father Williams: Surely many people deserve hell, but we must remember
that the mercy of God is infinitely greater than our wickedness.
Peter and Judas committed very similar faults: Peter denied Jesus three
times, and Judas handed him over. And yet now Peter is remembered as a
saint and Judas simply as the traitor.
The main difference between the two is not the nature or gravity of
their sin, but rather their willingness to accept God's mercy. Peter
wept for his sins, came back to Jesus, and was pardoned. The Gospel
describes Judas as hanging himself in despair.
Q: Why is the "Gospel of Judas" arousing so much interest?
Father Williams: Such theories regarding Judas are certainly not new.
It's enough to remember the 1973 play "Jesus Christ Superstar," where
Judas sings, "I have no thought at all about my own reward. I really
didn't come here of my own accord," or Taylor Caldwell's 1977 novel "I,
The enormous economic success of "The Da Vinci Code" has undoubtedly
stirred up the pot, and provided financial incentive for theories of
Michael Baigent, author of "Holy Blood, Holy Grail," now has a book out
called "The Jesus Papers," which recycles the old story that Jesus
survived the crucifixion.
And a newly released "scientific" study asserts that meteorological
conditions could have been such that Jesus really walked on ice, when
the Gospels say he walked on water.
Basically, for those who reject outright the possibility of miracles,
any theory, outlandish as it may be, trumps Christian claims.